Sentosa Restu (M) Sdn. Bhd (TALAM Group) is leaving a host of problems for the owners and residents of Komplek Suria Kinrara.
Talam, a public company under PN17 and IJM Construction (parent company IJM is also public listed), the main contractor for the project revival, did a good job in completing the project. Although the project was delayed by 1½ years from the court sanctioned completion date, IJM Construction delivered the project with fairly good finishing. There are defects in individual units but mostly internal defects, and they are minor in nature. The major defects are found in the common property.
The two swimming pools were encountering filtration system problems for a couple of months. Now, they look alright.
The biggest problem is with the electrical contractor, DAMAI ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING SDN BHD No,31 LORONG BUNGA MELATI 2A,TAMAN MAJU JAYA,68000 AMPANG, SELANGOR.
This sub-contractor is giving endless problems with all the corridor lighting. Even the internal wiring were badly done. Many owners engaged their own wireman to rectify the wiring system. They simply cannot wait for the irresponsible Damai Electrical workmen. Why is Sentosa Restu not taking action against Damai Electric? Up to this point of writing this post, the corridor and compound lighting are still out.
The lifts failed frequently. They are still under warranty, Why is Sentosa Restu not taking any action against the lift supplier?
The Automatic car park access system is one of the considerations given to purchasers, approved and sanctioned by the court. This system is deliverable upon hand over of vacant possession. The system is still not operational until today. Isn’t this a clear contempt of court order?
According to the Sale and Purchase Agreement, the Fourth Schedule Specifications, all doors are plywood flush doors. But the internal doors for all your rooms and toilets are cardboard doors. This is a deviation from the agreed specifications and amounting to cheating the purchasers. Who is responsible for this? Sentosa Restu or Contramec?
CF (Certificate of Fitness for Occupation) was issued by Majlis Perbandaran Subang Jaya (MPSJ)on the 8 October 2010. But the management company has to engage private garbage contractor to dispose garbage from the complex. Why is the residents’ money being used to dispose garbage and at the same time assessment is collected from the owners? Sentosa Restu is negligent in submitting the required documents to MPSJ to effect the full services from MPSJ. Right?
What is your perception of Talam, Sentosa Restu and IJM, as a housing developer and contractor for housing project? You can form your own perception and opinion of them.
According to Clause 22.4 of the Sale & Purchase Agreement for Suria Kinrara, Sentosa Restu covenanted and agreed to pay Liquidated and Ascertained Damage (LAD) to all purchasers at 10% per annum for any delay in delivering the vacant possession. Upon full payment of the purchase price, Sentosa Restu is still not paying the LAD. Six month has lapsed since the delivery of vacant possession and there is still no news on the LAD.
According to the Housing Ministry Housing Tribunal's regulation, all LAD must be claim within stipulated time frame:-
Jurisdiction of Housing Tribunal,
The Tribunal may hear claims from buyers on condition that:
a) A claim is filed no later than 12 months from the date of:-
The Tribunal may hear claims from buyers on condition that:
a) A claim is filed no later than 12 months from the date of:-
i) issue of the Certificate of Fitness for Occupation (CFO) of the property; or
ii) the expiry date of the defect liability period as set out in the Sales and Purchase Agreement.
ii) the expiry date of the defect liability period as set out in the Sales and Purchase Agreement.
Details of Housing Tribunal is appended below:
|
(with courtesy from Ministry of Housing and Local Government) http://www.kpkt.gov.my/kpkt_en/main.php?Content=sections&SectionID=4
All Suria Kinrara owners should proceed to submit your claim to Sentosa Restu (M) Sdn. Bhd. immediately. And after reasonable time period(14 days), if Sentosa Restu did not reply, proceed to file your claim with the Housing Tribunal.
Sample letter to Sentosa Restu (M) Sdn. Bhd. to claim your LAD or other damages is appended below.
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Date:
Sentosa Restu (M) Sdn. Bhd. (Company No. 177756-D)
Level 2, Menara Maxisegar,
Jalan Pandan Indah 4/2,
Pandan Indah,
55100 Kua la Lumpur.
Dear Sir,
RE: Claim for Liquidated and Ascertained Damage (LAD) on late completion and delivery of Suria Kinrara to Purchaser - Lot : Unit No. A 8-03 Block A, Komplek Suria Kinrara.
In accordance with Clause 22.4 of the Sale and Purchase Agreement for the above-mentioned Lot dated 15 May 2004, Sentosa Restu (M) Sdn. Bhd. is obligated to pay LAD at 10% per annum to the purchaser for the late delivery of vacant possession from the stipulated delivery date. The stipulated delivery date as per Court Order (Perintah Mahkamah) Petisyen No.06-26-61-08 Dalam Mahkamah Tinggi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur dated 17 September 2008 is not later than 8(eight) months from the date of court order. The latest stipulated completion date is 17 May 2009.
Sentosa Restu (M) Sdn. Bhd delivered the vacant possession to purchasers on the 11 October 2010. The delivery of vacant possession was 512 days late. Based on the Sale and Purchase agreement, Sentosa Restu (M) Sdn. Bhd is contractually obligated to pay me the sum of RM12,330.08 (Ringgit Twelve thousand three hundred and thirty and sen eight only) being the LAD computed as follow:-
Purchase Price ( RM87,900 X 10%)/365 days X 512 days = RM12,330.08.
I hereby demand that the sum of RM12,330.08 be paid to me not later than 14(fourteen) days from the date of this letter.
Should you fail to do so, I shall proceed with further actions to recover this sum without further reference to you.
Your sincerely.
(Type your name here)
Address: (type your correspondence address here)
Owners of Suria Kinrara are given the copyright authority to copy this sample letter from the blog.
I request all owners to submit your LAD claim immediately. Sentosa Restu is unlikely to respond to you. After 14 days, proceed to file your claim with the Housing Tribunal.
3 comments:
Hi,
How about the shop office LAD claim procedures?
Thanks.
Thanks Mr. Lim. Great of you to provide the template for LAD claim too. The URL for the Ministry of Housing Tribunal Dept. /Tribunal Tuntutan Pembeli Rumah (TTPR) to get forms is http://ehome.kpkt.gov.my/ehome/perkhidmatan/muatturunborang.cfm
There is even an example and guide to fill in the form. Accordingly, I have also claimed RM130.00 for Lain-Lain Kos.
But Sir the developer informed the payment will be done after 18 mths the house was delivered to the owner.
Shall i proceed with the letter u ask to post?
tx
Post a Comment